Happy NY everyone, and here's to hoping politics will get less stupid in 2006 and allow me to blog about something else!
Talk to you in twenty-o-six.
w00t!
Providing uninformed opinions on Politics, Economics, and Geek stuff, so you don't have to.
Petroleum imports are projected to decline one barrel for every barrel of ANWR production. Opening the coastal plain of ANWR is projected to reduce 2025 oil import dependence from 70 percent in the AEO2004 reference case to 66 percent in the mean resource case. The high and low oil resource cases project a 2025 oil import dependency of 64 percent and 67 percent, respectively.So, in the best of cases, given the information we know, we'll be reducing our import dependence from 70% to 64%. I've got to admit that the "it wont make much of a difference" argument seems to have some weight behind it.
The House Judiciary Committee today introduced a bill (HR 4569) to close the analog hole.I'm just going to remind everyone that copyright protections were originally implemented for the public good, not to bow to the whim of media companies and provide legal protections to their profit margins.
Here’s what we had to say about the draft version of the bill.
The government is proposing that devices (consumer electronics, computers, software) manufactured after a certain date respond to a copy-protection signal or watermark in a digital video stream, and pass along that signal when converting the video to analog. The same goes for analog video streams, to pass on the protection to the digital video outputs.
I will be on the Senate floor listening and taking part in the debate and if you have the opportunity, please tune in. It's clear that your voices are being heard. Our efforts continue to pick up steam and more and more members of Congress understand that we need to change this conference report to address the important civil liberties concerns we have discussed over the last 4 years.So, there's clearly good reason to believe our concerns are not falling on deaf ears. Reasonable civil liberties protections may not be dead just yet, folks.
A SUNSET IS ONLY A SECOND LEVEL OF PROTECTION SAYING, LOOK, PEOPLES' RIGHTS MIGHT BE VIOLATED NOW, BUT AT LEAST WE'LL HAVE A CHANCE TO CHANGE IT LATER.One of the things that has been drilled into my head since childhood, regarding the qualities which makes this country great, is that we are better than the fascists and the commies and whatever self-righteous goverments which ignore the principle of "government of the people, by the people, for the people". The country which I love is the country that is secure in its judicial processes over an authoritarian self-protection. I really have to give Russ some serious props for standing up for essential principles over a watered-down compromise, which compromise is fundamentally opposite to what I consider fundamental to our basic liberties.
[He] joined PNC Bank in 1984 as a corporate banking trainee in the credit department. In 1985, he was named commercial lending officer in East Stroudsburg corporate where he advanced to assistant vice president in 1986DAY-um!, boy...trainee to assistant vice president in two years? That is some serious-ass advancement.
But Phil Gingrey, a Georgia Republican, insisted his party was not "robbing the poor to pay the rich". Instead, he said, failure to extend the cuts would result in a tax increase.No... Failure to extend the cuts would result in: the end of the cuts. Pay special attention to that word "cuts". Or what other people might call "a return to the original level of taxation, prior to the cuts, which were sold as a temporary measure to kickstart the recession-addled economy." See how easy it is, Phil?
Every opportunity that Samuel Alito was given to comment or rule on involving abortion, he attempted to restrict access to or express his dismay with Roe v. Wade. He said, back in 1985, that the federal government should help states "chip away" at Roe. In his job application to be Deputy Assistant Attorney General, he volunteered, without prompting on the issue, that he believed that "the Constitution does not protect the right to an abortion." And, of course, in 1991, he dissented from the majority opinion on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, saying that a woman should be forced to tell her possibly raping, abusive husband that she wants an abortion.The point is that there's no reason to assume that our boy Harriet Jr. is anything other than an anti-Roe tool. But the backroom players all know that coming out and saying that is going to start a shitfit. And they hope they can make that fact slide through without too many people finding out.